Athlon II X3 435 vs Atom N570

Athlon II X3 435 vs Atom N570 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X3 435

3 / 3

1,645

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom N570

2 / 4

1,630

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X3 435 vs Atom N570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X3 435 vs Atom N570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X3 435

2009

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom N570.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $87 MSRP, while Atom N570 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌955.6% higher power demand at 95W vs 9W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N570 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom N570

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 95W, a 86W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Athlon II X3 435 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,630 vs 1,645).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X3 435.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X3 435 better than Atom N570?

Yes. Athlon II X3 435 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X3 435 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X3 435 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X3 435 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X3 435 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $87 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom N570 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X3 435 vs Atom N570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 435

The Athlon II X3 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,645 points. Launch price was $160.

Atom N570

The Atom N570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,630 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X3 435 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Atom N570 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X3 435 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X3 435 versus 1.67 GHz on the Atom N570 — a 53.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 435 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.66 GHz). The Athlon II X3 435 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Atom N570 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 435 scores 1,645 against the Atom N570's 1,630 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon II X3 435. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon II X3 435	Atom N570
Cores / Threads	3 / 3+50%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+74%	1.67 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+75%	1.66 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Rana (2009−2011)	Pineview (2009−2011)
PassMark	1,645	1,630

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X3 435 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom N570 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 435 versus DDR3-667 on the Atom N570 — the Athlon II X3 435 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X3 435 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon II X3 435) vs 1 (Atom N570). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X3 435) vs 0 (Atom N570) — the Athlon II X3 435 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM3 (Athlon II X3 435) and Intel NM10 (Atom N570).

Feature	Athlon II X3 435	Atom N570
Socket	AM3	FCBGA559
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+100%	DDR3-667
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+700%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X3 435) / not specified (Atom N570). The Atom N570 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon II X3 435 requires a dedicated GPU.