
A10-4655M vs Athlon II X3 435

A10-4655M

Athlon II X3 435
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-4655M is positioned at rank 740 and the Athlon II X3 435 is on rank 817, so the A10-4655M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-4655M
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 435
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-4655M | Athlon II X3 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-4655M | Athlon II X3 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-4655M and Athlon II X3 435

A10-4655M
The A10-4655M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon II X3 435
The Athlon II X3 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,645 points. Launch price was $160.
Processing Power
The A10-4655M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 435 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the A10-4655M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A10-4655M versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X3 435 — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 435 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10-4655M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X3 435 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4655M scores 1,654 against the Athlon II X3 435's 1,645 — a 0.5% lead for the A10-4655M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A10-4655M | Athlon II X3 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+33% | 3 / 3 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+700% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Rana (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,654 | 1,645 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-4655M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X3 435 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A10-4655M versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 435 — the A10-4655M supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-4655M) and AM3 (Athlon II X3 435).
| Feature | A10-4655M | Athlon II X3 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP2 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+44333% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 16 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-4655M) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X3 435). The A10-4655M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7620G), while the Athlon II X3 435 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-4655M rivals Core i3-4010U.
| Feature | A10-4655M | Athlon II X3 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7620G | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















