A10-4655M vs Athlon II X3 435

A10-4655M vs Athlon II X3 435 Performance Spectrum

A10-4655M

4 / 4

1,654

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X3 435

3 / 3

1,645

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4655M vs Athlon II X3 435 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4655M vs Athlon II X3 435: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4655M

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 25W instead of 95W, a 70W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7620G, while Athlon II X3 435 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X3 435.

Athlon II X3 435

2009

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A10-4655M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,645 vs 1,654).
❌Launch MSRP is still $87 MSRP, while A10-4655M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌280% higher power demand at 95W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4655M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-4655M better than Athlon II X3 435?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X3 435 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A10-4655M pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-4655M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-4655M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-4655M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $87 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Athlon II X3 435 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (18.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4655M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-4655M vs Athlon II X3 435 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4655M

The A10-4655M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon II X3 435

The Athlon II X3 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,645 points. Launch price was $160.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4655M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 435 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the A10-4655M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A10-4655M versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X3 435 — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 435 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10-4655M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X3 435 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4655M scores 1,654 against the Athlon II X3 435's 1,645 — a 0.5% lead for the A10-4655M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A10-4655M	Athlon II X3 435
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+33%	3 / 3
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	2.9 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.9 GHz+45%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+700%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark	1,654	1,645

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4655M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X3 435 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-4655M) and AM3 (Athlon II X3 435).

Feature	A10-4655M	Athlon II X3 435
Socket	FP2	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-4655M) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X3 435). The A10-4655M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7620G), while the Athlon II X3 435 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-4655M rivals Core i3-4010U.