A10-4655M
VS
Athlon II X3 435

A10-4655M vs Athlon II X3 435

AMD

A10-4655M

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Athlon II X3 435

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-4655M is positioned at rank 740 and the Athlon II X3 435 is on rank 817, so the A10-4655M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-4655M

#728
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1064%
#729
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1049%
#730
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
963%
#731
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
958%
#732
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
950%
#734
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
917%
#735
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
879%
#736
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
878%
#737
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
854%
#740
A10-4655M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#744
Pentium 6805
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#748
Ryzen 3 7320C
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 435

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16484%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15576%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11309%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3407%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2699%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2361%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1352%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1335%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1215%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1215%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1201%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1169%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1153%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1148%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1138%
#817
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#818
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
100%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
100%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
99%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
98%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
98%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
98%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
98%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
98%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
97%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
97%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
97%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X3 435 leads in gaming performance. However, the A10-4655M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA10-4655MAthlon II X3 435
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA10-4655MAthlon II X3 435
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-4655M and Athlon II X3 435

AMD

A10-4655M

The A10-4655M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $130.

AMD

Athlon II X3 435

The Athlon II X3 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,645 points. Launch price was $160.

Processing Power

The A10-4655M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 435 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the A10-4655M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A10-4655M versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X3 435 — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 435 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10-4655M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X3 435 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4655M scores 1,654 against the Athlon II X3 435's 1,645 — a 0.5% lead for the A10-4655M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA10-4655MAthlon II X3 435
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+33%
3 / 3
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.9 GHz+45%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)+700%
512 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark
1,654
1,645
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4655M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X3 435 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A10-4655M versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 435 — the A10-4655M supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-4655M) and AM3 (Athlon II X3 435).

FeatureA10-4655MAthlon II X3 435
Socket
FP2
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1333+44333%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
16 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-4655M) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X3 435). The A10-4655M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7620G), while the Athlon II X3 435 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-4655M rivals Core i3-4010U.

FeatureA10-4655MAthlon II X3 435
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7620G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V