Athlon II X3 435 vs Core M-5Y10
Athlon II X3 435
Core M-5Y10
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X3 435 is positioned at rank 817 and the Core M-5Y10 is on rank 1190, so the Athlon II X3 435 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 435
Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y10
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X3 435 | Core M-5Y10 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X3 435 | Core M-5Y10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+33%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X3 435 and Core M-5Y10
Athlon II X3 435
The Athlon II X3 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,645 points. Launch price was $160.
Core M-5Y10
The Core M-5Y10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,644 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X3 435 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Core M-5Y10 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X3 435 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X3 435 versus 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 435 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The Athlon II X3 435 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core M-5Y10 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 435 scores 1,645 against the Core M-5Y10's 1,644 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon II X3 435. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 435 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 435 | Core M-5Y10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 3 / 3+50% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz+45% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+262% | 0.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Rana (2009−2011) | Broadwell-Y (2014) |
| PassMark | 1,645 | 1,644 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X3 435 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core M-5Y10 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 435 | Core M-5Y10 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | FCBGA1234 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X3 435) / not specified (Core M-5Y10).
| Feature | Athlon II X3 435 | Core M-5Y10 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X3 435 launched at $87 MSRP, while the Core M-5Y10 debuted at $281. At current prices ($15 vs $20), the Athlon II X3 435 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X3 435 delivers 109.7 pts/$ vs 82.2 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y10 — making the Athlon II X3 435 the 28.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 435 | Core M-5Y10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $87-69% | $281 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 109.7+33% | 82.2 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X3 435 and Core M-5Y10
