Atom N570 vs Core i3-2357M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N570 vs Core i3-2357M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N570 vs Core i3-2357M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N570

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 17W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,630 vs 1,645).

Core i3-2357M

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌88.9% higher power demand at 17W vs 9W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2357M better than Atom N570?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom N570 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2357M pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2357M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2357M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-2357M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2357M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom N570 vs Core i3-2357M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N570

The Atom N570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,630 points. Launch price was $86.

Core i3-2357M

The Core i3-2357M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,645 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom N570 and Core i3-2357M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Atom N570 versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2357M — a 24.9% clock advantage for the Atom N570 (base: 1.66 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Atom N570 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-2357M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N570 scores 1,630 against the Core i3-2357M's 1,645 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-2357M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom N570 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2357M.

Feature	Atom N570	Core i3-2357M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.67 GHz+28%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.66 GHz+28%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,630	1,645
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	440
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	440

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N570 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-2357M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-667 on the Atom N570 versus 1333 on the Core i3-2357M — the Core i3-2357M supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2357M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N570) vs 2 (Core i3-2357M). PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom N570) vs 16 (Core i3-2357M) — the Core i3-2357M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N570) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i3-2357M).

Feature	Atom N570	Core i3-2357M
Socket	FCBGA559	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-667	1333+100%
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	16 GB+700%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom N570) / true (Core i3-2357M). Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3150 (Atom N570) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2357M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-2357M rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.