Atom N570 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N570 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N570 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N570

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 9W instead of 512W, a 503W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Celeron Dual-Core T1500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,625 vs 1,630).
❌5588.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 9W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N570 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom N570 better than Celeron Dual-Core T1500?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom N570 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom N570 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom N570 still makes the most sense overall. Atom N570 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom N570 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom N570 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N570

The Atom N570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,630 points. Launch price was $86.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.87 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,625 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom N570 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron Dual-Core T1500's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Atom N570 versus 1.87 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 — a 11.3% clock advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core T1500. The Atom N570 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N570 scores 1,630 against the Celeron Dual-Core T1500's 1,625 — a 0.3% lead for the Atom N570.

Feature	Atom N570	Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.67 GHz	1.87 GHz+12%
Base Clock	1.66 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,630	1,625

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both support up to DDR3-667 memory speed. The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N570) vs 2 (Celeron Dual-Core T1500). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N570) and GM965,GL960 (Celeron Dual-Core T1500).

Feature	Atom N570	Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Socket	FCBGA559	—
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-667	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom N570) / No (Celeron Dual-Core T1500). The Atom N570 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1500 rivals Pentium T2390.