A8-3510MX vs Atom N570

A8-3510MX vs Atom N570 Performance Spectrum

A8-3510MX

4 / 4

1,631

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom N570

2 / 4

1,630

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3510MX vs Atom N570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3510MX vs Atom N570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3510MX

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌400% higher power demand at 45W vs 9W.

Atom N570

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 45W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,630 vs 1,631).

Quick Answers

So, is A8-3510MX better than Atom N570?

Yes. A8-3510MX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-3510MX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-3510MX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-3510MX still makes the most sense overall. A8-3510MX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-3510MX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-3510MX vs Atom N570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3510MX

The A8-3510MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,631 points. Launch price was $90.

Atom N570

The Atom N570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,630 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-3510MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom N570 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3510MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A8-3510MX versus 1.67 GHz on the Atom N570 — a 39.8% clock advantage for the A8-3510MX (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.66 GHz). The A8-3510MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom N570 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3510MX scores 1,631 against the Atom N570's 1,630 — a 0.1% lead for the A8-3510MX. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A8-3510MX	Atom N570
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+50%	1.67 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+8%	1.66 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Pineview (2009−2011)
PassMark	1,631	1,630
Geekbench 6 Single	252	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3510MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom N570 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A8-3510MX versus DDR3-667 on the Atom N570 — the A8-3510MX supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-3510MX supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A8-3510MX) vs 1 (Atom N570). PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3510MX) vs 0 (Atom N570) — the A8-3510MX offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A8-3510MX	Atom N570
Socket	FS1	FCBGA559
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+140%	DDR3-667
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+700%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-3510MX) / not specified (Atom N570). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6620G (A8-3510MX) and Intel GMA 3150 (Atom N570) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3510MX targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-3510MX rivals Core i5-2410M.