A8-3510MX vs Core i3-2357M

A8-3510MX vs Core i3-2357M Performance Spectrum

A8-3510MX

4 / 4

1,631

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2357M

2 / 4

1,645

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3510MX vs Core i3-2357M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3510MX vs Core i3-2357M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3510MX

2011

Why buy it

✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,631 vs 1,645).
❌164.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 17W.

Core i3-2357M

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 17W instead of 45W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2357M better than A8-3510MX?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-3510MX is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2357M pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2357M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2357M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-2357M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2357M is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A8-3510MX vs Core i3-2357M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3510MX

The A8-3510MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,631 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i3-2357M

The Core i3-2357M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,645 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-3510MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-2357M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3510MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A8-3510MX versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2357M — a 63.2% clock advantage for the A8-3510MX (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The A8-3510MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-2357M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3510MX scores 1,631 against the Core i3-2357M's 1,645 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-2357M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3510MX vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2357M.

Feature	A8-3510MX	Core i3-2357M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+92%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+38%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,631	1,645
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	440
Geekbench 6 Single	252	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	440

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3510MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-2357M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A8-3510MX versus 1333 on the Core i3-2357M — the A8-3510MX supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3510MX) vs 16 (Core i3-2357M) — the A8-3510MX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A8-3510MX	Core i3-2357M
Socket	FS1	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3510MX) vs true (Core i3-2357M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6620G (A8-3510MX) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2357M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3510MX targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-3510MX rivals Core i5-2410M; Core i3-2357M rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.