A8-3510MX vs Athlon II X3 435

A8-3510MX vs Athlon II X3 435 Performance Spectrum

A8-3510MX

4 / 4

1,631

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X3 435

3 / 3

1,645

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3510MX vs Athlon II X3 435 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3510MX vs Athlon II X3 435: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3510MX

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6620G, while Athlon II X3 435 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,631 vs 1,645).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X3 435.

Athlon II X3 435

2009

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A8-3510MX.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $87 MSRP, while A8-3510MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-3510MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X3 435 better than A8-3510MX?

Yes. Athlon II X3 435 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X3 435 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X3 435 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X3 435 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X3 435 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $87 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-3510MX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-3510MX vs Athlon II X3 435 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3510MX

The A8-3510MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,631 points. Launch price was $90.

Athlon II X3 435

The Athlon II X3 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,645 points. Launch price was $160.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-3510MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 435 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the A8-3510MX has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A8-3510MX versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X3 435 — a 14.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 435 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A8-3510MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X3 435 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3510MX scores 1,631 against the Athlon II X3 435's 1,645 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon II X3 435. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A8-3510MX	Athlon II X3 435
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+33%	3 / 3
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+16%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.9 GHz+61%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark	1,631	1,645
Geekbench 6 Single	252	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3510MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X3 435 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A8-3510MX versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 435 — the A8-3510MX supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3510MX) vs 16 (Athlon II X3 435) — the A8-3510MX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A8-3510MX	Athlon II X3 435
Socket	FS1	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A8-3510MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6620G), while the Athlon II X3 435 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3510MX targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-3510MX rivals Core i5-2410M.