A8-3510MX vs Core M-5Y10

A8-3510MX vs Core M-5Y10 Performance Spectrum

A8-3510MX

4 / 4

1,631

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core M-5Y10

2 / 4

1,644

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3510MX vs Core M-5Y10 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3510MX vs Core M-5Y10: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3510MX

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6620G, while Core M-5Y10 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,631 vs 1,644).

Core M-5Y10

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-3510MX across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while A8-3510MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-3510MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core M-5Y10 better than A8-3510MX?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-3510MX is ahead with a 3.4% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y10 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y10 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core M-5Y10 is the better buy right now. Core M-5Y10 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that A8-3510MX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.4% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core M-5Y10 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-3510MX vs Core M-5Y10 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3510MX

The A8-3510MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,631 points. Launch price was $90.

Core M-5Y10

The Core M-5Y10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,644 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-3510MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core M-5Y10 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3510MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A8-3510MX versus 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the A8-3510MX (base: 1.8 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The A8-3510MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core M-5Y10 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3510MX scores 1,631 against the Core M-5Y10's 1,644 — a 0.8% lead for the Core M-5Y10. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3510MX vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10.

Feature	A8-3510MX	Core M-5Y10
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+125%	0.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark	1,631	1,644
Geekbench 6 Single	252	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3510MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core M-5Y10 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-3510MX	Core M-5Y10
Socket	FS1	FCBGA1234
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-3510MX) / not specified (Core M-5Y10). The A8-3510MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6620G), while the Core M-5Y10 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3510MX targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-3510MX rivals Core i5-2410M.