Pentium B950
VS
Celeron G1820TE

Pentium B950 vs Celeron G1820TE

Intel

Pentium B950

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron G1820TE

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium B950 is positioned at rank 1142 and the Celeron G1820TE is on rank 679, so the Celeron G1820TE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium B950

#1130
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3845%
#1131
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3789%
#1132
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3478%
#1133
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3463%
#1134
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3431%
#1136
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3313%
#1137
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3177%
#1138
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3172%
#1139
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3087%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
100%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
99%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
98%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
97%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
96%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1155
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
95%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
94%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1820TE

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12224%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11551%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8387%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2527%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2001%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1751%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1003%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
990%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
901%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
901%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
891%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
867%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
855%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
851%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
844%
#679
Celeron G1820TE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#680
Pentium G3420T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $40
100%
#681
Core i5-3570
MSRP: $194|Avg: $35
100%
#682
Pentium G3450T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $45
100%
#683
Celeron E3200
MSRP: $43|Avg: $5
99%
#684
Core i5-3470
MSRP: $184|Avg: $55
99%
#685
Core i5-3450S
MSRP: $174|Avg: $20
99%
#686
Core i7-5820K
MSRP: $389|Avg: $103
99%
#687
Core i3-4330
MSRP: $138|Avg: $60
99%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
97%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
97%
#691
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
97%
#692
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
97%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
97%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G1820TE leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium B950 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium B950Celeron G1820TE
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium B950Celeron G1820TE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium B950 and Celeron G1820TE

Intel

Pentium B950

The Pentium B950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,022 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Celeron G1820TE

The Celeron G1820TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium B950 and Celeron G1820TE share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Pentium B950 versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G1820TE — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820TE (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Pentium B950 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G1820TE uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium B950 scores 1,022 against the Celeron G1820TE's 1,020 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium B950. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 379 vs 415, a 9.1% lead for the Celeron G1820TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 671 vs 629 (6.5% advantage for the Pentium B950). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium B950 vs 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820TE.

FeaturePentium B950Celeron G1820TE
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz
2.2 GHz+5%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,022
1,020
Geekbench 6 Single
379
415+9%
Geekbench 6 Multi
671+7%
629
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium B950 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1820TE uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G1820TE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67 (Pentium B950) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820TE).

FeaturePentium B950Celeron G1820TE
Socket
PGA988
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Pentium B950) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium B950 targets Budget, Celeron G1820TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820TE rivals Pentium G3220T.

FeaturePentium B950Celeron G1820TE
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Budget