
Pentium B950 vs Core 2 Duo E6750

Pentium B950

Core 2 Duo E6750
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium B950 is positioned at rank 1142 and the Core 2 Duo E6750 is on rank 1069, so the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium B950
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6750
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium B950 | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($35) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium B950 | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+135%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($35) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium B950 and Core 2 Duo E6750

Pentium B950
The Pentium B950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,022 points. Launch price was $134.

Core 2 Duo E6750
The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Pentium B950 and Core 2 Duo E6750 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Pentium B950 versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — a 23.9% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Pentium B950 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium B950 scores 1,022 against the Core 2 Duo E6750's 1,029 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6750. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium B950 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6750.
| Feature | Pentium B950 | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.67 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.66 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 4 MB+1500% |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Conroe (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,022 | 1,029 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 379 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 671 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium B950 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Pentium B950 versus 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — the Core 2 Duo E6750 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67 (Pentium B950) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750).
| Feature | Pentium B950 | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | 1333+44333% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+104857500% | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Pentium B950) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6750). The Pentium B950 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium B950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.
| Feature | Pentium B950 | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | true |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Pentium B950 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E6750 debuted at $183. At current prices ($35 vs $15), the Core 2 Duo E6750 is $20 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium B950 delivers 29.2 pts/$ vs 68.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E6750 — making the Core 2 Duo E6750 the 80.6% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium B950 | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $134-27% | $183 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | $15-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.2 | 68.6+135% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















