
Pentium B950
Popular choices:

Pentium E6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Pentium B950
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium E6300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,022 vs 1,032).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
Pentium E6300
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium B950 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium B950
2011Pentium E6300
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium E6300 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,022 vs 1,032).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium B950 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium E6300 better than Pentium B950?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Pentium B950 | Pentium E6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Pentium B950 | Pentium E6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 26 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Pentium B950 | Pentium E6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Pentium B950 | Pentium E6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium B950 and Pentium E6300

Pentium B950
Pentium B950
The Pentium B950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,022 points. Launch price was $134.

Pentium E6300
Pentium E6300
The Pentium E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $40.
Processing Power
Both the Pentium B950 and Pentium E6300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Pentium B950 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium E6300 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Pentium E6300 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Pentium B950 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E6300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium B950 scores 1,022 against the Pentium E6300's 1,032 — a 1% lead for the Pentium E6300. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium B950 vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6300.
| Feature | Pentium B950 | Pentium E6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,022 | 1,032 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 379 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 671 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium B950 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pentium B950 | Pentium E6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Pentium B950) / not specified (Pentium E6300). The Pentium B950 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium E6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium B950 targets Budget.
| Feature | Pentium B950 | Pentium E6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Pentium B950 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Pentium E6300 debuted at $84. On MSRP ($134 vs $84), the Pentium E6300 is $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium B950 delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Pentium E6300 — making the Pentium E6300 the 46.8% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium B950 | Pentium E6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $134 | $84-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6 | 12.3+62% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












