
Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Pentium B950

Core 2 Duo E6750

Pentium B950
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E6750 is positioned at rank 1069 and the Pentium B950 is on rank 1142, so the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6750
Performance Per Dollar Pentium B950
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Pentium B950 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($35) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Pentium B950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+135%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($35) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E6750 and Pentium B950

Core 2 Duo E6750
The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium B950
The Pentium B950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,022 points. Launch price was $134.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E6750 and Pentium B950 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 versus 2.1 GHz on the Pentium B950 — a 23.9% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E6750 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium B950 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6750 scores 1,029 against the Pentium B950's 1,022 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6750. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6750 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium B950.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Pentium B950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.67 GHz+27% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz+27% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Conroe (2006−2007) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,029 | 1,022 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 379 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 671 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E6750 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium B950 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6750 versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium B950 — the Core 2 Duo E6750 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750) and HM65,HM67 (Pentium B950).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Pentium B950 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+44333% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 16 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core 2 Duo E6750) vs VT-x (Pentium B950). The Pentium B950 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium B950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Pentium B950 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E6750 launched at $183 MSRP, while the Pentium B950 debuted at $134. At current prices ($15 vs $35), the Core 2 Duo E6750 is $20 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E6750 delivers 68.6 pts/$ vs 29.2 pts/$ for the Pentium B950 — making the Core 2 Duo E6750 the 80.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Pentium B950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $183 | $134-27% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-57% | $35 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.6+135% | 29.2 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















