Pentium Dual Core T2410
VS
Core i3-3130M

Pentium Dual Core T2410 vs Core i3-3130M

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T2410

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i3-3130M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium Dual Core T2410 is positioned at rank 902 and the Core i3-3130M is on rank 22, so the Core i3-3130M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T2410

#890
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1547%
#891
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1525%
#892
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1400%
#893
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1393%
#894
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1381%
#896
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1333%
#897
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1278%
#898
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1276%
#899
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1242%
#902
Pentium Dual Core T2410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#903
FX-8800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#904
Core i7-8809G
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
99%
#911
Core i7-6820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#912
Athlon II Neo K325
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3130M

#10
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
154%
#11
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
152%
#12
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
139%
#13
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
139%
#14
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
137%
#16
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
133%
#17
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
127%
#18
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
127%
#19
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
124%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
96%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
95%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
92%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
91%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
90%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
90%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
90%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
89%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-3130M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium Dual Core T2410 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium Dual Core T2410Core i3-3130M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($100)
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Pentium Dual Core T2410 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $100 (vs $225), it costs 56% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 124% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i3-3130M.
InsightPentium Dual Core T2410Core i3-3130M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+124%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($100)
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium Dual Core T2410 and Core i3-3130M

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T2410

The Pentium Dual Core T2410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,896 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-3130M

The Core i3-3130M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Pentium Dual Core T2410 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-3130M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T2410 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-3130M — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-3130M. The Pentium Dual Core T2410 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-3130M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core T2410 scores 1,896 against the Core i3-3130M's 1,906 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-3130M.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T2410Core i3-3130M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.6 GHz+30%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
NetBurst (2000−2006)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,896
1,906
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium Dual Core T2410 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-3130M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 667 on the Pentium Dual Core T2410 versus 1600 on the Core i3-3130M — the Core i3-3130M supports 82.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3130M supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 4 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: Socket P (Pentium Dual Core T2410) and HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i3-3130M).

FeaturePentium Dual Core T2410Core i3-3130M
Socket
P
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
667
1600+140%
Max RAM Capacity
4
32+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: false (Pentium Dual Core T2410) vs true (Core i3-3130M). The Core i3-3130M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-3130M rivals AMD A8-4500M.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T2410Core i3-3130M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium Dual Core T2410 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Core i3-3130M debuted at $225.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T2410Core i3-3130M
MSRP
$100-56%
$225
Avg Price (30d)
$100
Release Date
2008
2013