Pentium Dual Core T4300
VS
Celeron 2950M

Pentium Dual Core T4300 vs Celeron 2950M

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4300

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron 2950M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium Dual Core T4300 is positioned at rank 1127 and the Celeron 2950M is on rank 545, so the Celeron 2950M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T4300

#1115
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3574%
#1116
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3521%
#1117
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3233%
#1118
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3218%
#1119
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3189%
#1121
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3079%
#1122
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2952%
#1123
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2948%
#1124
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2868%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
100%
#1128
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
100%
#1129
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
100%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
100%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
99%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
95%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
94%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
94%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
93%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2950M

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
97%
#533
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
711%
#534
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
701%
#535
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
643%
#536
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
640%
#537
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
634%
#539
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
613%
#540
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
587%
#541
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
586%
#542
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
571%
#545
Celeron 2950M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#549
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $49
98%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium Dual Core T4300 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 2950M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium Dual Core T4300Celeron 2950M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium Dual Core T4300Celeron 2950M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron 2950M

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4300

The Pentium Dual Core T4300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron 2950M

The Celeron 2950M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,238 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron 2950M share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4300 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron 2950M — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual Core T4300 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 2950M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core T4300 scores 1,232 against the Celeron 2950M's 1,238 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron 2950M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium Dual Core T4300 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 2950M.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T4300Celeron 2950M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz+5%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz+5%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
NetBurst (2000−2006)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,232
1,238
Geekbench 6 Single
352
Geekbench 6 Multi
636
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 2950M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-800 memory speed. The Celeron 2950M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Pentium Dual Core T4300) vs 16 (Celeron 2950M) — the Celeron 2950M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T4300Celeron 2950M
Socket
P
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T4300) vs VT-x (Celeron 2950M). The Celeron 2950M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium Dual Core T4300 targets Mobile, Celeron 2950M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2950M rivals Pentium 2020M.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T4300Celeron 2950M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
No VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile
Budget