
Pentium Dual Core T4300 vs Core 2 Duo E6420

Pentium Dual Core T4300

Core 2 Duo E6420
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium Dual Core T4300 is positioned at rank 1127 and the Core 2 Duo E6420 is on rank 1054, so the Core 2 Duo E6420 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T4300
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6420
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium Dual Core T4300 | Core 2 Duo E6420 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($99) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium Dual Core T4300 | Core 2 Duo E6420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+892%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($99) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Core 2 Duo E6420

Pentium Dual Core T4300
The Pentium Dual Core T4300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo E6420
The Core 2 Duo E6420 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,235 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Core 2 Duo E6420 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4300 versus 2.13 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6420 — a 1.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6420 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6420 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core T4300 scores 1,232 against the Core 2 Duo E6420's 1,235 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6420. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core T4300 | Core 2 Duo E6420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.13 GHz+1% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.13 GHz+1% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | NetBurst (2000−2006) | Conroe (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,232 | 1,235 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo E6420 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Pentium Dual Core T4300 versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6420 — the Core 2 Duo E6420 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E6420 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Pentium Dual Core T4300) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E6420) — the Core 2 Duo E6420 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core T4300 | Core 2 Duo E6420 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | P | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-800 | 1066+35433% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+52428700% | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T4300) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6420). Primary use case: Pentium Dual Core T4300 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6420 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5400+.
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core T4300 | Core 2 Duo E6420 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No VT-x | true |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Value Analysis
The Pentium Dual Core T4300 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E6420 debuted at $183. At current prices ($99 vs $10), the Core 2 Duo E6420 is $89 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium Dual Core T4300 delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 123.5 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E6420 — making the Core 2 Duo E6420 the 163.4% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core T4300 | Core 2 Duo E6420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-18% | $183 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $99 | $10-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | 123.5+896% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















