Pentium E5400 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Pentium E5400
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium E5400 is positioned at rank 830 and the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is on rank 1038, so the Pentium E5400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium E5400
Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium E5400 | Celeron Dual-Core T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) | ✅ More affordable ($30) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium E5400 | Celeron Dual-Core T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+63%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) | ✅ More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium E5400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Pentium E5400
The Pentium E5400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $55.
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Pentium E5400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Pentium E5400 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Pentium E5400. The Pentium E5400 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium E5400 scores 1,007 against the Celeron Dual-Core T3300's 1,005 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium E5400.
| Feature | Pentium E5400 | Celeron Dual-Core T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+35% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,007 | 1,005 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 520 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium E5400 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pentium E5400 | Celeron Dual-Core T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | P |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Pentium E5400) / No (Celeron Dual-Core T3300). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T3300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T3300 rivals Pentium T4200.
| Feature | Pentium E5400 | Celeron Dual-Core T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Pentium E5400 launched at $55 MSRP, while the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 debuted at $86. At current prices ($49 vs $30), the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is $19 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium E5400 delivers 20.6 pts/$ vs 33.5 pts/$ for the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 — making the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 the 47.9% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium E5400 | Celeron Dual-Core T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-36% | $86 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $30-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.6 | 33.5+63% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pentium E5400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300
