
Pentium E5400 vs Celeron T3300

Pentium E5400

Celeron T3300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium E5400 is positioned at rank 830 and the Celeron T3300 is on rank 1038, so the Pentium E5400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium E5400
Performance Per Dollar Celeron T3300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium E5400 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium E5400 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+226%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium E5400 and Celeron T3300

Pentium E5400
The Pentium E5400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $55.

Celeron T3300
The Celeron T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Pentium E5400 is built on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium E5400 scores 1,007 against the Celeron T3300's 1,005 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium E5400. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium E5400 vs 1 MB on the Celeron T3300.
| Feature | Pentium E5400 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+35% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | — |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | — |
| PassMark | 1,007 | 1,005 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium E5400 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron T3300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pentium E5400 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
Value Analysis
The Pentium E5400 launched at $55 MSRP, while the Celeron T3300 debuted at $86. At current prices ($49 vs $15), the Celeron T3300 is $34 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium E5400 delivers 20.6 pts/$ vs 67.0 pts/$ for the Celeron T3300 — making the Celeron T3300 the 106.1% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium E5400 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-36% | $86 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.6 | 67.0+225% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















