Pentium E5400 vs Pentium J2850

Intel

Pentium E5400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium J2850

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Pentium E5400 vs Pentium J2850 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium E5400 vs Pentium J2850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium E5400 vs Pentium J2850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium E5400

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $39 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $94 MSRP).
  • Delivers 69.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.3 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($55 MSRP vs $94 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,007 vs 1,016).
  • 3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.

Pentium J2850

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.9% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 18.3 PassMark/$ ($94 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium J2850 better than Pentium E5400?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium E5400 is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium J2850 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium J2850 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium J2850 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium J2850 comes in 70.9% more expensive on MSRP at $94 MSRP versus $55 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. Pentium E5400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 69.4% better value on paper (18.3 vs 10.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium J2850 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium E5400 vs Pentium J2850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Pentium E5400

The Pentium E5400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $55.

Intel

Pentium J2850

The Pentium J2850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,016 points. Launch price was $94.

Processing Power

The Pentium E5400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium J2850 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J2850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Pentium E5400 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium J2850 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Pentium E5400 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.41 GHz). The Pentium E5400 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium J2850 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium E5400 scores 1,007 against the Pentium J2850's 1,016 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium J2850. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium E5400 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium J2850.

FeaturePentium E5400Pentium J2850
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+13%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+12%
2.41 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)
2 MB
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark
1,007
1,016
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium E5400 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium J2850 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium E5400Pentium J2850
Socket
LGA775
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium E5400 was priced at $55, while the Pentium J2850 came in at $94. On launch pricing ($55 vs $94), Pentium E5400 was $39 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium E5400 delivers 18.3 pts/$ vs 10.8 pts/$ for the Pentium J2850 — making the Pentium E5400 the 51.5% better value option.

FeaturePentium E5400Pentium J2850
MSRP
$55-41%
$94
Performance per Dollar
18.3+69%
10.8
Release Date
2009
2013

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.