E1-6010 vs Pentium E5400

E1-6010 vs Pentium E5400 Performance Spectrum

E1-6010

2 / 2

1,006

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium E5400

2 / 2

1,007

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E1-6010 vs Pentium E5400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E1-6010 vs Pentium E5400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E1-6010

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,006 vs 1,007).

Pentium E5400

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $55 MSRP, while E1-6010 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E5400 better than E1-6010?

Yes. Pentium E5400 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium E5400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E5400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E5400 is the better buy right now. Pentium E5400 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $55 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-6010 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

E1-6010 vs Pentium E5400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E1-6010

The E1-6010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.35 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,006 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium E5400

The Pentium E5400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $55.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the E1-6010 and Pentium E5400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.35 GHz on the E1-6010 versus 2.7 GHz on the Pentium E5400 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Pentium E5400. The E1-6010 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium E5400 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E1-6010 scores 1,006 against the Pentium E5400's 1,007 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium E5400.

Feature	E1-6010	Pentium E5400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.35 GHz	2.7 GHz+100%
Base Clock	—	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1024 kB	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Beema (2014)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,006	1,007

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-6010 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E5400 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.