Core 2 Duo E4700 vs E1-6010

Core 2 Duo E4700 vs E1-6010 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo E4700

2 / 2

1,011

+0.5%

1,006

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E4700 vs E1-6010 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E4700 vs E1-6010: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E4700

2008

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike E1-6010.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $133 MSRP, while E1-6010 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.

E1-6010

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,006 vs 1,011).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E4700.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E4700 better than E1-6010?

Yes. Core 2 Duo E4700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo E4700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo E4700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo E4700 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo E4700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $133 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-6010 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo E4700 vs E1-6010 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E4700

The Core 2 Duo E4700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,011 points. Launch price was $249.

E1-6010

The E1-6010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.35 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,006 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E4700 and E1-6010 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4700 versus 1.35 GHz on the E1-6010 — a 63.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4700. The Core 2 Duo E4700 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the E1-6010 uses Beema (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E4700 scores 1,011 against the E1-6010's 1,006 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo E4700.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E4700	E1-6010
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+93%	1.35 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1024 kB
Process	65 nm	28 nm-57%
Architecture	Allendale (2006−2009)	Beema (2014)
PassMark	1,011	1,006

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E4700 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E1-6010 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.