
Core 2 Duo E4700

Core 2 Duo E8135
Core 2 Duo E4700 vs Core 2 Duo E8135 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo E4700 vs Core 2 Duo E8135 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo E4700 vs Core 2 Duo E8135: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo E4700
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $67 less on MSRP ($133 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.6 vs 5.1 PassMark/$ ($133 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core 2 Duo E8135.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo E8135 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,011 vs 1,020).
- ❌47.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 44W.
Core 2 Duo E8135
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 44W instead of 65W, a 21W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E4700.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo E8135 better than Core 2 Duo E4700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo E4700 vs Core 2 Duo E8135 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E4700
The Core 2 Duo E4700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,011 points. Launch price was $249.

Core 2 Duo E8135
The Core 2 Duo E8135 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.667 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E4700 and Core 2 Duo E8135 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4700 versus 0.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8135 — a 118% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4700 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.667 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E4700 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8135 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E4700 scores 1,011 against the Core 2 Duo E8135's 1,020 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8135.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4700 | Core 2 Duo E8135 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+288% | 0.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.667 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB (total)+200% |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Allendale (2006−2009) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,011 | 1,020 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E4700 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo E8135 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4700 | Core 2 Duo E8135 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | P |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Core 2 Duo E4700) / not specified (Core 2 Duo E8135). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E4700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4700 | Core 2 Duo E8135 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo E4700 was priced at $133, while the Core 2 Duo E8135 came in at $200. On launch pricing ($133 vs $200), Core 2 Duo E4700 was $67 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E4700 delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 5.1 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8135 — making the Core 2 Duo E4700 the 39.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4700 | Core 2 Duo E8135 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $133-34% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6+49% | 5.1 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














