Celeron G1820TE vs Core 2 Duo E4700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1820TE vs Core 2 Duo E4700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1820TE vs Core 2 Duo E4700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1820TE

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 54W instead of 65W, a 11W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Core 2 Duo E4700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E4700.

Core 2 Duo E4700

2008

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron G1820TE.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,011 vs 1,020).
❌Launch MSRP is still $133 MSRP, while Celeron G1820TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌20.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1820TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1820TE better than Core 2 Duo E4700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E4700 is ahead with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1820TE pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1820TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1820TE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron G1820TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $133 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. Core 2 Duo E4700 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (7.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1820TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1820TE vs Core 2 Duo E4700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1820TE

The Celeron G1820TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo E4700

The Core 2 Duo E4700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,011 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1820TE and Core 2 Duo E4700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G1820TE versus 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4700 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4700 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron G1820TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E4700 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820TE scores 1,020 against the Core 2 Duo E4700's 1,011 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron G1820TE. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820TE vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E4700.

Feature	Celeron G1820TE	Core 2 Duo E4700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark	1,020	1,011
Geekbench 6 Single	415	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	629	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E4700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1820TE versus 800 on the Core 2 Duo E4700 — the Celeron G1820TE supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1820TE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820TE) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E4700).

Feature	Celeron G1820TE	Core 2 Duo E4700
Socket	LGA1150	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+67%	800
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1820TE) vs false (Core 2 Duo E4700). The Celeron G1820TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Core 2 Duo E4700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820TE rivals Pentium G3220T; Core 2 Duo E4700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.