Celeron G1820TE vs V-Series V105

Celeron G1820TE vs V-Series V105 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G1820TE

2 / 2

1,020

0.0%

1,028

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1820TE vs V-Series V105 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1820TE vs V-Series V105: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1820TE

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while V-Series V105 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,020 vs 1,028).

V-Series V105

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1820TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1820TE better than V-Series V105?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1820TE is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, V-Series V105 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, V-Series V105 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1820TE still makes the most sense overall. Celeron G1820TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1820TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1820TE vs V-Series V105 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1820TE

The Celeron G1820TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $69.

V-Series V105

The V-Series V105 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 May 2010 (15 years ago). It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1820TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the V-Series V105 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron G1820TE has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G1820TE versus 1.2 GHz on the V-Series V105 — a 58.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820TE. The Celeron G1820TE is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G1820TE scores 1,020 against the V-Series V105's 1,028 — a 0.8% lead for the V-Series V105.

Feature	Celeron G1820TE	V-Series V105
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+83%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	—
PassMark	1,020	1,028
Geekbench 6 Single	415	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	629	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the V-Series V105 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1820TE	V-Series V105
Socket	LGA1150	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1820TE) / not specified (V-Series V105). The Celeron G1820TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the V-Series V105 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820TE rivals Pentium G3220T.