Celeron G1820TE
VS
Core i3-330M

Celeron G1820TE vs Core i3-330M

Intel

Celeron G1820TE

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i3-330M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 0.13 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1820TE is positioned at rank 679 and the Core i3-330M is on rank 276, so the Core i3-330M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1820TE

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12224%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11551%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8387%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2527%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2001%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1751%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1003%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
990%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
901%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
901%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
891%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
867%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
855%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
851%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
844%
#679
Celeron G1820TE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#680
Pentium G3420T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $40
100%
#681
Core i5-3570
MSRP: $194|Avg: $35
100%
#682
Pentium G3450T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $45
100%
#683
Celeron E3200
MSRP: $43|Avg: $5
99%
#684
Core i5-3470
MSRP: $184|Avg: $55
99%
#685
Core i5-3450S
MSRP: $174|Avg: $20
99%
#686
Core i7-5820K
MSRP: $389|Avg: $103
99%
#687
Core i3-4330
MSRP: $138|Avg: $60
99%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
97%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
97%
#691
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
97%
#692
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
97%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
97%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-330M

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
97%
#264
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
426%
#265
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
420%
#266
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
386%
#267
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
384%
#268
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
380%
#270
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
367%
#271
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
352%
#272
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
352%
#273
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
342%
#276
Core i3-330M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G1820TE leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-330M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron G1820TECore i3-330M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G1820TECore i3-330M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1820TE and Core i3-330M

Intel

Celeron G1820TE

The Celeron G1820TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-330M

The Core i3-330M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $49.

Processing Power

The Celeron G1820TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-330M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G1820TE versus 0.13 GHz on the Core i3-330M — a 177.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820TE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Celeron G1820TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-330M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820TE scores 1,020 against the Core i3-330M's 1,032 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-330M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 415 vs 317, a 26.8% lead for the Celeron G1820TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 629 vs 689 (9.1% advantage for the Core i3-330M). Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron G1820TECore i3-330M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+1592%
0.13 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+3%
2.13 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,020
1,032+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
415+31%
317
Geekbench 6 Multi
629
689+10%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-330M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G1820TE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820TE) and HM55,PM55,QM57 (Core i3-330M).

FeatureCeleron G1820TECore i3-330M
Socket
LGA1150
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1820TE) vs VT-x / EPT (Core i3-330M). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820TE) and Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale) (Core i3-330M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820TE targets Budget, Core i3-330M targets Legacy Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820TE rivals Pentium G3220T; Core i3-330M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.

FeatureCeleron G1820TECore i3-330M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x / EPT
Target Use
Budget
Legacy Budget