Celeron G1820TE vs Core i5-560UM

Intel

Celeron G1820TE

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-560UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 2.13 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G1820TE vs Core i5-560UM Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1820TE vs Core i5-560UM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1820TE vs Core i5-560UM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1820TE

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • 200% higher power demand at 54W vs 18W.

Core i5-560UM

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 18W instead of 54W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G1820TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (1,015 vs 1,020).
  • Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Celeron G1820TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1820TE better than Core i5-560UM?
Yes. Celeron G1820TE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1820TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1820TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G1820TE is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron G1820TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-560UM only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.5% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G1820TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1820TE vs Core i5-560UM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G1820TE

The Celeron G1820TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-560UM

The Core i5-560UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $250.

Processing Power

The Celeron G1820TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-560UM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G1820TE versus 2.13 GHz on the Core i5-560UM — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820TE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.33 GHz). The Celeron G1820TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-560UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820TE scores 1,020 against the Core i5-560UM's 1,015 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G1820TE. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820TE vs 3 MB on the Core i5-560UM.

FeatureCeleron G1820TECore i5-560UM
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+3%
2.13 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+65%
1.33 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,020
1,015
Geekbench 6 Single
415
Geekbench 6 Multi
629
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-560UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1820TE versus 800 on the Core i5-560UM — the Celeron G1820TE supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1820TE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820TE) and HM55,HM57,QM57,QS57 (Core i5-560UM).

FeatureCeleron G1820TECore i5-560UM
Socket
LGA1150
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333+67%
800
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1820TE) vs true (Core i5-560UM). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820TE) and Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) (Core i5-560UM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820TE rivals Pentium G3220T; Core i5-560UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400.

FeatureCeleron G1820TECore i5-560UM
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Budget