Celeron G1820TE vs Core 2 Duo E6750

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1820TE vs Core 2 Duo E6750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1820TE vs Core 2 Duo E6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1820TE

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 54W instead of 65W, a 11W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Core 2 Duo E6750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,020 vs 1,029).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6750.

Core 2 Duo E6750

2007

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron G1820TE.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $183 MSRP, while Celeron G1820TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌20.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1820TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E6750 better than Celeron G1820TE?

Yes. Core 2 Duo E6750 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo E6750 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo E6750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo E6750 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo E6750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $183 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1820TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1820TE vs Core 2 Duo E6750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1820TE

The Celeron G1820TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo E6750

The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1820TE and Core 2 Duo E6750 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G1820TE versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — a 19.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron G1820TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820TE scores 1,020 against the Core 2 Duo E6750's 1,029 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6750. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820TE vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6750.

Feature	Celeron G1820TE	Core 2 Duo E6750
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.67 GHz+21%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.66 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4 MB+1500%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,020	1,029
Geekbench 6 Single	415	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	629	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G1820TE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820TE) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750).

Feature	Celeron G1820TE	Core 2 Duo E6750
Socket	LGA1150	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1820TE) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6750). The Celeron G1820TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820TE rivals Pentium G3220T; Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.