
Celeron G1820TE

Celeron J3060
Celeron G1820TE vs Celeron J3060 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G1820TE vs Celeron J3060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G1820TE vs Celeron J3060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G1820TE
2013Why buy it
- ✅+107.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌800% higher power demand at 54W vs 6W.
Celeron J3060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 54W, a 48W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (200 vs 415).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (370 vs 629).
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G1820TE better than Celeron J3060?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G1820TE vs Celeron J3060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1820TE
The Celeron G1820TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron J3060
The Celeron J3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G1820TE and Celeron J3060 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G1820TE versus 2.48 GHz on the Celeron J3060 — a 12% clock advantage for the Celeron J3060 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron G1820TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron J3060 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820TE scores 1,020 against the Celeron J3060's 1,015 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G1820TE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 415 vs 200, a 69.9% lead for the Celeron G1820TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 629 vs 370 (51.9% advantage for the Celeron G1820TE). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820TE vs 0 kB on the Celeron J3060.
| Feature | Celeron G1820TE | Celeron J3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.48 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+38% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Airmont (2016) |
| PassMark | 1,020 | 1,015 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 415+108% | 200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 629+70% | 370 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G1820TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J3060 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1820TE versus DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron J3060 — the Celeron J3060 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1820TE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1820TE) vs 4 (Celeron J3060) — the Celeron G1820TE offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820TE) and SoC (Celeron J3060).
| Feature | Celeron G1820TE | Celeron J3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3L-1600+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+300% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1820TE) vs VT-x, EPT (Celeron J3060). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820TE) and Intel HD Graphics 400 (Celeron J3060) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820TE targets Budget, Celeron J3060 targets Low Power Desktop/NAS. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820TE rivals Pentium G3220T; Celeron J3060 rivals Pentium J3710.
| Feature | Celeron G1820TE | Celeron J3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Haswell) | Intel HD Graphics 400 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget | Low Power Desktop/NAS |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













