Celeron G1820TE vs Celeron J3060

Intel

Celeron G1820TE

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Celeron J3060

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.48 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G1820TE vs Celeron J3060 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1820TE vs Celeron J3060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1820TE vs Celeron J3060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1820TE

2013

Why buy it

  • +107.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • 300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 800% higher power demand at 54W vs 6W.

Celeron J3060

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 6W instead of 54W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (200 vs 415).
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (370 vs 629).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1820TE better than Celeron J3060?
Yes. Celeron G1820TE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 70% better Geekbench multi-core, and 0.5% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1820TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1820TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 70% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G1820TE still makes the most sense overall. Celeron G1820TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron J3060 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1820TE vs Celeron J3060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G1820TE

The Celeron G1820TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron J3060

The Celeron J3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1820TE and Celeron J3060 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G1820TE versus 2.48 GHz on the Celeron J3060 — a 12% clock advantage for the Celeron J3060 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron G1820TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron J3060 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820TE scores 1,020 against the Celeron J3060's 1,015 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G1820TE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 415 vs 200, a 69.9% lead for the Celeron G1820TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 629 vs 370 (51.9% advantage for the Celeron G1820TE). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820TE vs 0 kB on the Celeron J3060.

FeatureCeleron G1820TECeleron J3060
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.48 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+38%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Airmont (2016)
PassMark
1,020
1,015
Geekbench 6 Single
415+108%
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
629+70%
370
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J3060 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1820TE versus DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron J3060 — the Celeron J3060 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1820TE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1820TE) vs 4 (Celeron J3060) — the Celeron G1820TE offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820TE) and SoC (Celeron J3060).

FeatureCeleron G1820TECeleron J3060
Socket
LGA1150
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16+300%
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1820TE) vs VT-x, EPT (Celeron J3060). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820TE) and Intel HD Graphics 400 (Celeron J3060) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820TE targets Budget, Celeron J3060 targets Low Power Desktop/NAS. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820TE rivals Pentium G3220T; Celeron J3060 rivals Pentium J3710.

FeatureCeleron G1820TECeleron J3060
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Intel HD Graphics 400
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Budget
Low Power Desktop/NAS