Celeron G1820TE vs Pentium 957

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1820TE vs Pentium 957 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1820TE vs Pentium 957: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1820TE

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Pentium 957 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌217.6% higher power demand at 54W vs 17W.

Pentium 957

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 54W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G1820TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,015 vs 1,020).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Celeron G1820TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1820TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1820TE better than Pentium 957?

Yes. Celeron G1820TE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1820TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1820TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1820TE is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron G1820TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium 957 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1820TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011), 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1820TE vs Pentium 957 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1820TE

The Celeron G1820TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium 957

The Pentium 957 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1820TE and Pentium 957 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G1820TE versus 1.2 GHz on the Pentium 957 — a 58.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820TE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron G1820TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium 957 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820TE scores 1,020 against the Pentium 957's 1,015 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G1820TE. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820TE vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 957.

Feature	Celeron G1820TE	Pentium 957
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+83%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+83%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)+50%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,020	1,015
Geekbench 6 Single	415	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	629	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 957 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1820TE	Pentium 957
Socket	LGA1150	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1820TE) / not specified (Pentium 957). The Celeron G1820TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Pentium 957 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820TE rivals Pentium G3220T.