Core 2 Duo E4700 vs Pentium 957

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E4700 vs Pentium 957 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E4700 vs Pentium 957: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E4700

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($133 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium 957.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,011 vs 1,015).
❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.

Pentium 957

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
0.8% HIGHER MSRP
$134 MSRPvs$133 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E4700.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 957 better than Core 2 Duo E4700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E4700 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 957 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 957 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 957 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium 957 comes in 0.8% more expensive on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $133 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. Core 2 Duo E4700 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 0.4% better value on paper (7.6 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 957 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo E4700 vs Pentium 957 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E4700

The Core 2 Duo E4700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,011 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium 957

The Pentium 957 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E4700 and Pentium 957 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4700 versus 1.2 GHz on the Pentium 957 — a 73.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4700 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E4700 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium 957 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E4700 scores 1,011 against the Pentium 957's 1,015 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium 957. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E4700 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 957.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E4700	Pentium 957
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+117%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+117%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Allendale (2006−2009)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,011	1,015

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E4700 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium 957 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E4700	Pentium 957
Socket	LGA775	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	800	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Core 2 Duo E4700) / not specified (Pentium 957). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E4700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E4700	Pentium 957
Integrated GPU	No	—
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	false	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Duo E4700 was priced at $133, while the Pentium 957 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($133 vs $134), Core 2 Duo E4700 was $1 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E4700 delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Pentium 957 — making the Core 2 Duo E4700 the 0.4% better value option.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E4700	Pentium 957
MSRP	$133	$134
Performance per Dollar	7.6	7.6
Release Date	2008	2011

Search Core 2 Duo E4700 on Amazon

Search Pentium 957 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.