Core 2 Duo E4700 vs Pentium J2850

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E4700 vs Pentium J2850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E4700 vs Pentium J2850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E4700

2008

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium J2850.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,011 vs 1,016).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($133 MSRP vs $94 MSRP).
❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.

Pentium J2850

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($94 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
✅Delivers 42.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.8 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($94 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E4700.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium J2850 better than Core 2 Duo E4700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E4700 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium J2850 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium J2850 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium J2850 is the better buy right now. Pentium J2850 comes in $39 cheaper on MSRP at $94 MSRP versus $133 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo E4700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 42.2% better value on MSRP (10.8 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium J2850 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo E4700 vs Pentium J2850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E4700

The Core 2 Duo E4700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,011 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium J2850

The Pentium J2850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,016 points. Launch price was $94.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E4700 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium J2850 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J2850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4700 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium J2850 — a 8% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4700 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.41 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E4700 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium J2850 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E4700 scores 1,011 against the Pentium J2850's 1,016 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium J2850. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E4700 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium J2850.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E4700	Pentium J2850
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+8%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+8%	2.41 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Process	65 nm	22 nm-66%
Architecture	Allendale (2006−2009)	Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark	1,011	1,016

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E4700 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium J2850 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E4700	Pentium J2850
Socket	LGA775	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	800	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Core 2 Duo E4700) / not specified (Pentium J2850). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E4700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E4700	Pentium J2850
Integrated GPU	No	—
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	false	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Duo E4700 was priced at $133, while the Pentium J2850 came in at $94. On launch pricing ($133 vs $94), Pentium J2850 was $39 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E4700 delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 10.8 pts/$ for the Pentium J2850 — making the Pentium J2850 the 34.8% better value option.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E4700	Pentium J2850
MSRP	$133	$94-29%
Performance per Dollar	7.6	10.8+42%
Release Date	2008	2013

Search Core 2 Duo E4700 on Amazon

Search Pentium J2850 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.