E1-6010 vs Pentium J2850

E1-6010 vs Pentium J2850 Performance Spectrum

E1-6010

2 / 2

1,006

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium J2850

4 / 4

1,016

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E1-6010 vs Pentium J2850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E1-6010 vs Pentium J2850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E1-6010

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,006 vs 1,016).
❌400% higher power demand at 10W vs 2W.

Pentium J2850

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 10W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $94 MSRP, while E1-6010 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium J2850 better than E1-6010?

Yes. Pentium J2850 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium J2850 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium J2850 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium J2850 is the better buy right now. Pentium J2850 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $94 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-6010 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

E1-6010 vs Pentium J2850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E1-6010

The E1-6010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.35 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,006 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium J2850

The Pentium J2850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,016 points. Launch price was $94.

⚡

Processing Power

The E1-6010 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium J2850 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J2850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.35 GHz on the E1-6010 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium J2850 — a 56% clock advantage for the Pentium J2850. The E1-6010 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium J2850 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the E1-6010 scores 1,006 against the Pentium J2850's 1,016 — a 1% lead for the Pentium J2850.

Feature	E1-6010	Pentium J2850
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.35 GHz	2.4 GHz+78%
Base Clock	—	2.41 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1024 kB	2 MB+100%
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Beema (2014)	Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark	1,006	1,016

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-6010 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium J2850 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.