E1-6010 vs Pentium 2117U

AMD

E1-6010

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.35 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium 2117U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

E1-6010 vs Pentium 2117U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E1-6010 vs Pentium 2117U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E1-6010 vs Pentium 2117U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E1-6010

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 10W instead of 512W, a 502W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,006 vs 1,009).

Pentium 2117U

2012

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • 5020% higher power demand at 512W vs 10W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium 2117U better than E1-6010?
    Yes. Pentium 2117U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium 2117U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 2117U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium 2117U still makes the most sense overall. Pentium 2117U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    E1-6010 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    E1-6010 vs Pentium 2117U Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    E1-6010

    The E1-6010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.35 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,006 points. Launch price was $50.

    Intel

    Pentium 2117U

    The Pentium 2117U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,009 points. Launch price was $134.

    Processing Power

    Both the E1-6010 and Pentium 2117U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.35 GHz on the E1-6010 versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium 2117U — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Pentium 2117U. The E1-6010 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium 2117U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the E1-6010 scores 1,006 against the Pentium 2117U's 1,009 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium 2117U.

    FeatureE1-6010Pentium 2117U
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    1.35 GHz
    1.8 GHz+33%
    Base Clock
    1.8 GHz
    L3 Cache
    2 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1024 kB+300%
    256K (per core)
    Process
    28 nm
    22 nm-21%
    Architecture
    Beema (2014)
    Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
    PassMark
    1,006
    1,009
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The E1-6010 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 2117U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureE1-6010Pentium 2117U
    Socket
    FT3
    BGA1023
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0