Core i3-3229Y vs E1-6010

Core i3-3229Y vs E1-6010 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-3229Y

2 / 4

1,014

+0.8%

1,006

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-3229Y vs E1-6010 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-3229Y vs E1-6010: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-3229Y

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while E1-6010 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌5020% higher power demand at 512W vs 10W.

E1-6010

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 512W, a 502W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,006 vs 1,014).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3229Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-3229Y better than E1-6010?

Yes. Core i3-3229Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-3229Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3229Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-3229Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-3229Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-6010 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-3229Y vs E1-6010 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3229Y

The Core i3-3229Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,014 points. Launch price was $250.

E1-6010

The E1-6010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.35 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,006 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-3229Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the E1-6010's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-3229Y versus 1.35 GHz on the E1-6010 — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-3229Y. The Core i3-3229Y uses the Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the E1-6010 uses Beema (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3229Y scores 1,014 against the E1-6010's 1,006 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-3229Y.

Feature	Core i3-3229Y	E1-6010
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz+4%	1.35 GHz
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1024 kB+300%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-Y (2013)	Beema (2014)
PassMark	1,014	1,006
Geekbench 6 Single	350	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3229Y uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E1-6010 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-3229Y	E1-6010
Socket	BGA1023	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3229Y) / not specified (E1-6010). The Core i3-3229Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the E1-6010 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3229Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-3229Y rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.