Celeron J3060 vs Core i3-3229Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J3060 vs Core i3-3229Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J3060 vs Core i3-3229Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J3060

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (200 vs 350).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (370 vs 657).

Core i3-3229Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+75% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-3229Y better than Celeron J3060?

Yes. Core i3-3229Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 77.6% better Geekbench multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-3229Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3229Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 77.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-3229Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-3229Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J3060 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J3060 vs Core i3-3229Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3060

The Celeron J3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i3-3229Y

The Core i3-3229Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,014 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J3060 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-3229Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.48 GHz on the Celeron J3060 versus 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-3229Y — a 55.7% clock advantage for the Celeron J3060 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Celeron J3060 uses the Airmont (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-3229Y uses Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3060 scores 1,015 against the Core i3-3229Y's 1,014 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron J3060. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 200 vs 350, a 54.5% lead for the Core i3-3229Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 370 vs 657 (55.9% advantage for the Core i3-3229Y). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron J3060 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3229Y.

Feature	Celeron J3060	Core i3-3229Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.48 GHz+77%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+14%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Airmont (2016)	Ivy Bridge-Y (2013)
PassMark	1,015	1,014
Geekbench 6 Single	200	350+75%
Geekbench 6 Multi	370	657+78%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J3060 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3229Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-3229Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J3060) vs 16 (Core i3-3229Y) — the Core i3-3229Y offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron J3060) and HM77,UM77 (Core i3-3229Y).

Feature	Celeron J3060	Core i3-3229Y
Socket	FCBGA1170	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 400 (Celeron J3060) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3229Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3060 targets Low Power Desktop/NAS, Core i3-3229Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron J3060 rivals Pentium J3710; Core i3-3229Y rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.

Feature	Celeron J3060	Core i3-3229Y
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 400	HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, EPT	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Low Power Desktop/NAS	Budget