Celeron J3060 vs Pentium E5400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J3060 vs Pentium E5400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J3060 vs Pentium E5400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J3060

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Pentium E5400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium E5400

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,007 vs 1,015).
❌Launch MSRP is still $55 MSRP, while Celeron J3060 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3060 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J3060 better than Pentium E5400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium E5400 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J3060 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J3060 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J3060 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron J3060 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $55 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. Pentium E5400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (18.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J3060 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J3060 vs Pentium E5400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3060

The Celeron J3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium E5400

The Pentium E5400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $55.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J3060 and Pentium E5400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.48 GHz on the Celeron J3060 versus 2.7 GHz on the Pentium E5400 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Pentium E5400 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Celeron J3060 uses the Airmont (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium E5400 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3060 scores 1,015 against the Pentium E5400's 1,007 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron J3060. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron J3060	Pentium E5400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.48 GHz	2.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.7 GHz+69%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Airmont (2016)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,015	1,007
Geekbench 6 Single	200	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	370	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J3060 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E5400 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J3060	Pentium E5400
Socket	FCBGA1170	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Celeron J3060) / not specified (Pentium E5400). The Celeron J3060 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Pentium E5400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3060 targets Low Power Desktop/NAS. Direct competitor: Celeron J3060 rivals Pentium J3710.