Celeron J3060 vs Pentium J2850

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J3060 vs Pentium J2850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J3060 vs Pentium J2850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J3060

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Pentium J2850 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,015 vs 1,016).
❌200% higher power demand at 6W vs 2W.

Pentium J2850

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 6W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $94 MSRP, while Celeron J3060 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3060 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium J2850 better than Celeron J3060?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron J3060 is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium J2850 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium J2850 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium J2850 is the better buy right now. Pentium J2850 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $94 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Celeron J3060 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J3060 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J3060 vs Pentium J2850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3060

The Celeron J3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium J2850

The Pentium J2850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,016 points. Launch price was $94.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J3060 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium J2850 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J2850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.48 GHz on the Celeron J3060 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium J2850 — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Celeron J3060 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.41 GHz). The Celeron J3060 uses the Airmont (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium J2850 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3060 scores 1,015 against the Pentium J2850's 1,016 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium J2850. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron J3060 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium J2850.

Feature	Celeron J3060	Pentium J2850
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.48 GHz+3%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.41 GHz+51%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Airmont (2016)	Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark	1,015	1,016
Geekbench 6 Single	200	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	370	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Celeron J3060	Pentium J2850
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Celeron J3060) / not specified (Pentium J2850). The Celeron J3060 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Pentium J2850 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3060 targets Low Power Desktop/NAS. Direct competitor: Celeron J3060 rivals Pentium J3710.