Celeron G1820TE vs Core i3-3229Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1820TE vs Core i3-3229Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1820TE vs Core i3-3229Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1820TE

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (629 vs 657).

Core i3-3229Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+4.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G1820TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1820TE better than Core i3-3229Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1820TE is ahead with a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3229Y pulls ahead with 4.5% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3229Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1820TE still makes the most sense overall. Celeron G1820TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-3229Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1820TE vs Core i3-3229Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1820TE

The Celeron G1820TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-3229Y

The Core i3-3229Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,014 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1820TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-3229Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G1820TE versus 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-3229Y — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820TE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Celeron G1820TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-3229Y uses Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820TE scores 1,020 against the Core i3-3229Y's 1,014 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G1820TE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 415 vs 350, a 17% lead for the Celeron G1820TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 629 vs 657 (4.4% advantage for the Core i3-3229Y). Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron G1820TE	Core i3-3229Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+57%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+57%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Ivy Bridge-Y (2013)
PassMark	1,020	1,014
Geekbench 6 Single	415+19%	350
Geekbench 6 Multi	629	657+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3229Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1820TE versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-3229Y — the Core i3-3229Y supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820TE) and HM77,UM77 (Core i3-3229Y).

Feature	Celeron G1820TE	Core i3-3229Y
Socket	LGA1150	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3L-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1820TE) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3229Y). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820TE) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3229Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820TE targets Budget, Core i3-3229Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820TE rivals Pentium G3220T; Core i3-3229Y rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.