Athlon II X2 240e vs Core i3-3229Y

Athlon II X2 240e vs Core i3-3229Y Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 240e

2 / 2

1,007

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-3229Y

2 / 4

1,014

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Core i3-3229Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Core i3-3229Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 240e

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i3-3229Y.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,007 vs 1,014).
❌Launch MSRP is still $77 MSRP, while Core i3-3229Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3229Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-3229Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Athlon II X2 240e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 240e.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 240e better than Core i3-3229Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X2 240e is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3229Y pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3229Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 240e is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 240e comes in at an unclear MSRP at $77 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-3229Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-3229Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Core i3-3229Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 240e

The Athlon II X2 240e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $35.

Core i3-3229Y

The Core i3-3229Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,014 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X2 240e packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-3229Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240e versus 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-3229Y — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240e (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Athlon II X2 240e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-3229Y uses Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 240e scores 1,007 against the Core i3-3229Y's 1,014 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-3229Y. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 240e vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3229Y.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Core i3-3229Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+100%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+100%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Ivy Bridge-Y (2013)
PassMark	1,007	1,014
Geekbench 6 Single	—	350
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	657

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 240e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3229Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 240e versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-3229Y — the Core i3-3229Y supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3229Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 240e) vs 16 (Core i3-3229Y) — the Core i3-3229Y offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 240e) and HM77,UM77 (Core i3-3229Y).

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Core i3-3229Y
Socket	AM3	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3L-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 240e) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3229Y). The Core i3-3229Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Athlon II X2 240e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3229Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240e rivals Pentium E5400; Core i3-3229Y rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.