Athlon II X2 240e vs Core i5-560UM

Athlon II X2 240e vs Core i5-560UM Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 240e

2 / 2

1,007

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-560UM

2 / 4

1,015

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Core i5-560UM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Core i5-560UM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 240e

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $173 less on MSRP ($77 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 222.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 4.1 PassMark/$ ($77 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i5-560UM.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,007 vs 1,015).
❌150% higher power demand at 45W vs 18W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-560UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-560UM

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 18W instead of 45W, a 27W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while Athlon II X2 240e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $77 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 240e.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-560UM better than Athlon II X2 240e?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X2 240e is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-560UM pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-560UM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-560UM is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-560UM comes in 224.7% more expensive on MSRP at $250 MSRP versus $77 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. Athlon II X2 240e only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 222.1% better value on paper (13.1 vs 4.1 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-560UM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Core i5-560UM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 240e

The Athlon II X2 240e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $35.

Core i5-560UM

The Core i5-560UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X2 240e packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-560UM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240e versus 2.13 GHz on the Core i5-560UM — a 27.2% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240e (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.33 GHz). The Athlon II X2 240e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-560UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 240e scores 1,007 against the Core i5-560UM's 1,015 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-560UM. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 240e vs 3 MB on the Core i5-560UM.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Core i5-560UM
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+31%	2.13 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+111%	1.33 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,007	1,015

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 240e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-560UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 240e versus 800 on the Core i5-560UM — the Athlon II X2 240e supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 240e supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 240e) vs 16 (Core i5-560UM) — the Core i5-560UM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 240e) and HM55,HM57,QM57,QS57 (Core i5-560UM).

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Core i5-560UM
Socket	AM3	BGA1288
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333+67%	800
Max RAM Capacity	16+100%	8
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Core i5-560UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Athlon II X2 240e requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240e rivals Pentium E5400; Core i5-560UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Core i5-560UM
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X2 240e was priced at $77, while the Core i5-560UM came in at $250. On launch pricing ($77 vs $250), Athlon II X2 240e was $173 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 240e delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 4.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-560UM — making the Athlon II X2 240e the 105.2% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Core i5-560UM
MSRP	$77-69%	$250
Performance per Dollar	13.1+220%	4.1
Release Date	2009	2010

Search Athlon II X2 240e on Amazon

Search Core i5-560UM on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.