Athlon II X2 240e vs Pentium 957

AMD

Athlon II X2 240e

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Pentium 957

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2011

Athlon II X2 240e vs Pentium 957 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Pentium 957 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Pentium 957: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 240e

2009

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $57 less on MSRP ($77 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 72.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($77 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium 957.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (1,007 vs 1,015).
  • ❌164.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 17W.

Pentium 957

2011

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.8% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…Draws 17W instead of 45W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $77 MSRP).
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 240e.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 957 better than Athlon II X2 240e?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X2 240e is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 957 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 957 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium 957 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium 957 comes in 74.0% more expensive on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $77 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. Athlon II X2 240e only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 72.7% better value on paper (13.1 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium 957 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Pentium 957 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II X2 240e

The Athlon II X2 240e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009βˆ’2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $35.

Intel

Pentium 957

The Pentium 957 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011βˆ’2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $134.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 240e and Pentium 957 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240e versus 1.2 GHz on the Pentium 957 β€” a 80% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240e (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Athlon II X2 240e uses the Regor (2009βˆ’2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium 957 uses Sandy Bridge (2011βˆ’2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 240e scores 1,007 against the Pentium 957's 1,015 β€” a 0.8% lead for the Pentium 957. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 240e vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 957.

FeatureAthlon II X2 240ePentium 957
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+133%
1.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+133%
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB
256K (per core)+25500%
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Regor (2009βˆ’2013)
Sandy Bridge (2011βˆ’2013)
PassMark
1,007
1,015
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 240e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 957 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon II X2 240ePentium 957
Socket
AM3
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1333
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
16
β€”
RAM Channels
2
β€”
ECC Support
No
β€”
PCIe Lanes
0
β€”
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Athlon II X2 240e) / not specified (Pentium 957). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240e rivals Pentium E5400.

FeatureAthlon II X2 240ePentium 957
Integrated GPU
No
β€”
IGPU Model
None
β€”
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
No
β€”
Virtualization
true
β€”
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X2 240e was priced at $77, while the Pentium 957 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($77 vs $134), Athlon II X2 240e was $57 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 240e delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Pentium 957 β€” making the Athlon II X2 240e the 53.3% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II X2 240ePentium 957
MSRP
$77-43%
$134
Performance per Dollar
13.1+72%
7.6
Release Date
2009
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.