
Athlon II X2 240e vs Pentium B960

Athlon II X2 240e

Pentium B960
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X2 240e is positioned at rank 941 and the Pentium B960 is on rank 1144, so the Athlon II X2 240e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 240e
Performance Per Dollar Pentium B960
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X2 240e | Pentium B960 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($77) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X2 240e | Pentium B960 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+419%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($77) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 240e and Pentium B960

Athlon II X2 240e
The Athlon II X2 240e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $35.

Pentium B960
The Pentium B960 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,019 points. Launch price was $134.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 240e and Pentium B960 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240e versus 2.2 GHz on the Pentium B960 — a 24% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240e (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Athlon II X2 240e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium B960 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 240e scores 1,007 against the Pentium B960's 1,019 — a 1.2% lead for the Pentium B960. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 240e vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium B960.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 240e | Pentium B960 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+27% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+27% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,007 | 1,019+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 383 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 679 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 240e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium B960 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 240e versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium B960 — the Athlon II X2 240e supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 240e) vs 16 (Pentium B960) — the Pentium B960 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 240e) and HM76 (Pentium B960).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 240e | Pentium B960 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+44333% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 16 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization: true (Athlon II X2 240e) / not specified (Pentium B960). The Pentium B960 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Athlon II X2 240e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium B960 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240e rivals Pentium E5400; Pentium B960 rivals AMD A8-3500M.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 240e | Pentium B960 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | — |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X2 240e launched at $77 MSRP, while the Pentium B960 debuted at $134. At current prices ($77 vs $15), the Pentium B960 is $62 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 240e delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 67.9 pts/$ for the Pentium B960 — making the Pentium B960 the 135.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 240e | Pentium B960 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $77-43% | $134 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $77 | $15-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1 | 67.9+418% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















