Athlon II X2 240e vs Pentium B960

Athlon II X2 240e vs Pentium B960 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 240e

2 / 2

1,007

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium B960

2 / 2

1,019

+1.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Pentium B960 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Pentium B960: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 240e

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $57 less on MSRP ($77 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 72.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($77 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium B960.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,007 vs 1,019).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium B960 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Pentium B960

2011

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Athlon II X2 240e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $77 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 240e.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium B960 better than Athlon II X2 240e?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X2 240e is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium B960 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium B960 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium B960 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium B960 comes in 74.0% more expensive on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $77 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. Athlon II X2 240e only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 72.0% better value on paper (13.1 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium B960 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Pentium B960 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 240e

The Athlon II X2 240e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $35.

Pentium B960

The Pentium B960 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,019 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 240e and Pentium B960 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240e versus 2.2 GHz on the Pentium B960 — a 24% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240e (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Athlon II X2 240e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium B960 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 240e scores 1,007 against the Pentium B960's 1,019 — a 1.2% lead for the Pentium B960. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 240e vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium B960.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Pentium B960
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+27%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+27%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,007	1,019+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	383
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	679

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 240e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium B960 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 240e) vs 16 (Pentium B960) — the Pentium B960 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 240e) and HM76 (Pentium B960).

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Pentium B960
Socket	AM3	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization: true (Athlon II X2 240e) / not specified (Pentium B960). The Pentium B960 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Athlon II X2 240e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium B960 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240e rivals Pentium E5400; Pentium B960 rivals AMD A8-3500M.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Pentium B960
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	—
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X2 240e was priced at $77, while the Pentium B960 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($77 vs $134), Athlon II X2 240e was $57 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 240e delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Pentium B960 — making the Athlon II X2 240e the 52.9% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Pentium B960
MSRP	$77-43%	$134
Performance per Dollar	13.1+72%	7.6
Release Date	2009	2011

Search Athlon II X2 240e on Amazon

Search Pentium B960 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.