
Athlon II X2 240e

Core 2 Duo E8135
Athlon II X2 240e vs Core 2 Duo E8135 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 240e vs Core 2 Duo E8135 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 240e vs Core 2 Duo E8135: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 240e
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $123 less on MSRP ($77 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 156.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 5.1 PassMark/$ ($77 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core 2 Duo E8135.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo E8135 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,007 vs 1,020).
Core 2 Duo E8135
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 44W instead of 45W, a 1W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $77 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 240e.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo E8135 better than Athlon II X2 240e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 240e vs Core 2 Duo E8135 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 240e
The Athlon II X2 240e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $35.

Core 2 Duo E8135
The Core 2 Duo E8135 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.667 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 240e and Core 2 Duo E8135 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240e versus 0.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8135 — a 122.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240e (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.667 GHz). The Athlon II X2 240e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8135 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 240e scores 1,007 against the Core 2 Duo E8135's 1,020 — a 1.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8135.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 240e | Core 2 Duo E8135 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+318% | 0.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+5% | 2.667 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB (total)+500% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,007 | 1,020+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 240e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8135 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 240e | Core 2 Duo E8135 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | P |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Athlon II X2 240e) / not specified (Core 2 Duo E8135). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240e rivals Pentium E5400.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 240e | Core 2 Duo E8135 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 240e was priced at $77, while the Core 2 Duo E8135 came in at $200. On launch pricing ($77 vs $200), Athlon II X2 240e was $123 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 240e delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 5.1 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8135 — making the Athlon II X2 240e the 87.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 240e | Core 2 Duo E8135 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $77-62% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1+157% | 5.1 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















