Pentium E6700
VS
A6-3400M

Pentium E6700 vs A6-3400M

Intel

Pentium E6700

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A6-3400M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium E6700 is positioned at rank 915 and the A6-3400M is on rank 869, so the A6-3400M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E6700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21998%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20786%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15092%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4547%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3601%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3151%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1805%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1781%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1622%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1621%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1603%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1560%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1538%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1532%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1518%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
99%
#919
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
99%
#920
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
99%
#921
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
99%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
98%
#924
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
97%
#925
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
97%
#926
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
97%
#927
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
97%
#928
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
96%
#930
Celeron E1400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $63
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3400M

#857
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1440%
#858
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1419%
#859
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1302%
#860
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1296%
#861
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1284%
#863
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1240%
#864
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1189%
#865
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1187%
#866
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1156%
#869
A6-3400M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
99%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
99%
#882
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium E6700 leads in gaming performance. However, the A6-3400M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium E6700A6-3400M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium E6700A6-3400M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium E6700 and A6-3400M

Intel

Pentium E6700

The Pentium E6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,219 points. Launch price was $80.

AMD

A6-3400M

The A6-3400M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,223 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Pentium E6700 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A6-3400M offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3400M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Pentium E6700 versus 2.3 GHz on the A6-3400M — a 32.7% clock advantage for the Pentium E6700 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Pentium E6700 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the A6-3400M uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium E6700 scores 1,219 against the A6-3400M's 1,223 — a 0.3% lead for the A6-3400M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium E6700A6-3400M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+39%
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+129%
1.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,219
1,223
Geekbench 6 Single
218
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium E6700 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A6-3400M uses FS1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Pentium E6700) vs 16 (A6-3400M) — the A6-3400M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeaturePentium E6700A6-3400M
Socket
LGA775
FS1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Pentium E6700) vs AMD-V (A6-3400M). The A6-3400M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6520G), while the Pentium E6700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium E6700 targets Desktop, A6-3400M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-3400M rivals Core i3-2310M.

FeaturePentium E6700A6-3400M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6520G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
Budget Laptop