Pentium E6700
VS
Celeron 3855U

Pentium E6700 vs Celeron 3855U

Intel

Pentium E6700

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Celeron 3855U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium E6700 is positioned at rank 915 and the Celeron 3855U is on rank 193, so the Celeron 3855U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E6700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21998%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20786%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15092%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4547%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3601%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3151%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1805%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1781%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1622%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1621%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1603%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1560%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1538%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1532%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1518%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
99%
#919
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
99%
#920
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
99%
#921
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
99%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
98%
#924
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
97%
#925
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
97%
#926
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
97%
#927
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
97%
#928
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
96%
#930
Celeron E1400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $63
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3855U

#181
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
362%
#182
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
357%
#183
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
328%
#184
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
326%
#185
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
323%
#187
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
312%
#188
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
299%
#189
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
299%
#190
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
291%
#193
Celeron 3855U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#194
Pentium Gold 4417U
MSRP: $161|Avg: N/A
100%
#195
Atom N475
MSRP: $75|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium E6700 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 3855U in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium E6700Celeron 3855U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium E6700Celeron 3855U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium E6700 and Celeron 3855U

Intel

Pentium E6700

The Pentium E6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,219 points. Launch price was $80.

Intel

Celeron 3855U

The Celeron 3855U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,215 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium E6700 and Celeron 3855U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Pentium E6700 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 3855U — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Pentium E6700 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Pentium E6700 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 3855U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium E6700 scores 1,219 against the Celeron 3855U's 1,215 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium E6700. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium E6700 vs 2 MB on the Celeron 3855U.

FeaturePentium E6700Celeron 3855U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+100%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+100%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+300%
512 kB
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
1,219
1,215
Geekbench 6 Single
361
Geekbench 6 Multi
632
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium E6700 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 3855U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Pentium E6700 versus DDR4 2133 MHz on the Celeron 3855U — the Celeron 3855U supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 3855U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Pentium E6700) vs 10 (Celeron 3855U) — the Celeron 3855U offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeaturePentium E6700Celeron 3855U
Socket
LGA775
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR4 2133 MHz+33%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Pentium E6700) vs true (Celeron 3855U). The Celeron 3855U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 510), while the Pentium E6700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium E6700 targets Desktop, Celeron 3855U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3855U rivals Pentium 3825U.

FeaturePentium E6700Celeron 3855U
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Desktop
Budget