Pentium G3250T
VS
Atom N2800

Pentium G3250T vs Atom N2800

Intel

Pentium G3250T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Atom N2800

2 Cores4 Thrd7 WWMax: 1.87 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium G3250T is positioned at rank 617 and the Atom N2800 is on rank 147, so the Atom N2800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3250T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10972%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10367%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7528%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2268%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1796%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1571%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
900%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
888%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
809%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
809%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
800%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
778%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
767%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
764%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
757%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
97%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
99%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
98%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
98%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
100%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
100%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
100%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
99%
#625
Celeron G440
MSRP: $37|Avg: $5
98%
#628
A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
97%
#629
Core i3-8350K
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
97%
#630
Core i3-6320
MSRP: $160|Avg: $35
97%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N2800

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
96%
#135
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
321%
#136
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
316%
#137
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
290%
#138
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
289%
#139
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
286%
#141
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
276%
#142
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
265%
#143
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
265%
#144
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
258%
#147
Atom N2800
MSRP: $47|Avg: $3
100%
#158
Core i5-3210M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium G3250T leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom N2800 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium G3250TAtom N2800
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($3)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Cedarview-M (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Atom N2800 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 90% cheaper ($3 vs $30) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium G3250TAtom N2800
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+906%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($3)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium G3250T and Atom N2800

Intel

Pentium G3250T

The Pentium G3250T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,818 points. Launch price was $46.

Intel

Atom N2800

The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.

Processing Power

The Pentium G3250T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom N2800's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G3250T versus 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 — a 39.8% clock advantage for the Pentium G3250T (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Pentium G3250T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Atom N2800 uses Cedarview-M (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G3250T scores 1,818 against the Atom N2800's 1,829 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom N2800. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3250T vs 0 kB on the Atom N2800.

FeaturePentium G3250TAtom N2800
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+50%
1.87 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+51%
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,818
1,829
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G3250T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom N2800 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium G3250TAtom N2800
Socket
LGA1150
FCBGA559
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom N2800 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Pentium G3250T requires a dedicated GPU.

FeaturePentium G3250TAtom N2800
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3650
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium G3250T launched at $64 MSRP, while the Atom N2800 debuted at $47. At current prices ($30 vs $3), the Atom N2800 is $27 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G3250T delivers 60.6 pts/$ vs 609.7 pts/$ for the Atom N2800 — making the Atom N2800 the 163.8% better value option.

FeaturePentium G3250TAtom N2800
MSRP
$64
$47-27%
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$3-90%
Performance per Dollar
60.6
609.7+906%
Release Date
2014
2011