Pentium G3250T vs Core 2 Quad Q8200
Pentium G3250T
Core 2 Quad Q8200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium G3250T is positioned at rank 617 and the Core 2 Quad Q8200 is on rank 1028, so the Pentium G3250T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3250T
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q8200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium G3250T | Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($36) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium G3250T | Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+21%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($36) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium G3250T and Core 2 Quad Q8200
Pentium G3250T
The Pentium G3250T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,818 points. Launch price was $46.
Core 2 Quad Q8200
The Core 2 Quad Q8200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,807 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Pentium G3250T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q8200 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q8200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G3250T versus 2.33 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8200 — a 18.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G3250T (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The Pentium G3250T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q8200 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G3250T scores 1,818 against the Core 2 Quad Q8200's 1,807 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium G3250T. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3250T vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q8200.
| Feature | Pentium G3250T | Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+20% | 2.33 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+20% | 2.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4 MB (total)+1500% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,818 | 1,807 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium G3250T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q8200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pentium G3250T | Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Pentium G3250T) / VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q8200). Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q8200 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Pentium G3250T | Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Pentium G3250T launched at $64 MSRP, while the Core 2 Quad Q8200 debuted at $224. At current prices ($30 vs $36), the Pentium G3250T is $6 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G3250T delivers 60.6 pts/$ vs 50.2 pts/$ for the Core 2 Quad Q8200 — making the Pentium G3250T the 18.8% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium G3250T | Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $64-71% | $224 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-17% | $36 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.6+21% | 50.2 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pentium G3250T and Core 2 Quad Q8200
