Pentium G3460T vs Xeon X5355

Intel

Pentium G3460T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon X5355

4 Cores4 Thrd120 WWMax: 0.67 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······

Pentium G3460T vs Xeon X5355 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium G3460T vs Xeon X5355 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium G3460T vs Xeon X5355: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium G3460T

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $4,422 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
  • Delivers 6399.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.5 vs 0.5 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,036 vs 2,039).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5355, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon X5355

2006

Why buy it

  • +166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 29.5 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
  • 242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5355 better than Pentium G3460T?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5355 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium G3460T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5355 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 35 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5355 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon X5355 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon X5355 comes in 6408.7% more expensive on MSRP at $4,491 MSRP versus $69 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 35 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G3460T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 6399.1% better value on paper (29.5 vs 0.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium G3460T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium G3460T vs Xeon X5355 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Pentium G3460T

The Pentium G3460T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,036 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon X5355

The Xeon X5355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,039 points. Launch price was $1,172.

Processing Power

The Pentium G3460T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon X5355 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5355 has 2 more cores. The Xeon X5355 is built on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium G3460T scores 2,036 against the Xeon X5355's 2,039 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon X5355. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Pentium G3460T vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5355.

FeaturePentium G3460TXeon X5355
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
0.67 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+13%
2.66 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB
8 MB L2 Cache+167%
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark
2,036
2,039
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G3460T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5355 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium G3460TXeon X5355
Socket
LGA1150
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium G3460T was priced at $69, while the Xeon X5355 came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($69 vs $4491), Pentium G3460T was $4422 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G3460T delivers 29.5 pts/$ vs 0.5 pts/$ for the Xeon X5355 — making the Pentium G3460T the 193.9% better value option.

FeaturePentium G3460TXeon X5355
MSRP
$69-98%
$4491
Performance per Dollar
29.5+5800%
0.5
Release Date
2015
2006

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.