Celeron G3900E vs Pentium G3460T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900E vs Pentium G3460T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900E vs Pentium G3460T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900E

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Pentium G3460T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,034 vs 2,036).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.0 vs 29.5 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).

Pentium G3460T

2015

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Costs $38 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 55.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.5 vs 19.0 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G3460T better than Celeron G3900E?

Yes. Pentium G3460T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium G3460T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G3460T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G3460T is the better buy right now. Pentium G3460T comes in $38 cheaper on MSRP at $69 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 55.2% better value on MSRP (29.5 vs 19.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3900E vs Pentium G3460T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900E

The Celeron G3900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,034 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium G3460T

The Pentium G3460T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,036 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3900E and Pentium G3460T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron G3900E is built on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G3900E scores 2,034 against the Pentium G3460T's 2,036 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium G3460T. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900E vs 3 MB on the Pentium G3460T.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Pentium G3460T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	—
PassMark	2,034	2,036
Geekbench 6 Single	699	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3900E) / not specified (Pentium G3460T). The Celeron G3900E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Pentium G3460T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900E rivals Pentium G4400.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Pentium G3460T
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 510	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3900E was priced at $107, while the Pentium G3460T came in at $69. On launch pricing ($107 vs $69), Pentium G3460T was $38 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900E delivers 19.0 pts/$ vs 29.5 pts/$ for the Pentium G3460T — making the Pentium G3460T the 43.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Pentium G3460T
MSRP	$107	$69-36%
Performance per Dollar	19.0	29.5+55%
Release Date	2016	2015

Search Celeron G3900E on Amazon

Search Pentium G3460T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.