Celeron G3900E vs Phenom II X4 810

Celeron G3900E vs Phenom II X4 810 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G3900E

2 / 2

2,034

0.0%

2,036

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900E vs Phenom II X4 810 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900E vs Phenom II X4 810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900E

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $68 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $175 MSRP).
✅Delivers 63.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.0 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $175 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Phenom II X4 810 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,034 vs 2,036).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).

Phenom II X4 810

2009

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 19.0 PassMark/$ ($175 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X4 810 better than Celeron G3900E?

Yes. Phenom II X4 810 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X4 810 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 810 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X4 810 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Phenom II X4 810 comes in 63.6% more expensive on MSRP at $175 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3900E only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2016 platform. Even with 63.4% better value on paper (19.0 vs 11.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on that older DDR4-era platform.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3900E vs Phenom II X4 810 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900E

The Celeron G3900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,034 points. Launch price was $107.

Phenom II X4 810

The Phenom II X4 810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,036 points. Launch price was $116.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3900E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 810 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 810 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G3900E versus 2.6 GHz on the Phenom II X4 810 — a 8% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 810. The Celeron G3900E uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X4 810 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900E scores 2,034 against the Phenom II X4 810's 2,036 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom II X4 810. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900E vs 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 810.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Phenom II X4 810
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.6 GHz+8%
Base Clock	—	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,034	2,036
Geekbench 6 Single	699	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3900E) / not specified (Phenom II X4 810). The Celeron G3900E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Phenom II X4 810 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900E rivals Pentium G4400.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Phenom II X4 810
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 510	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3900E was priced at $107, while the Phenom II X4 810 came in at $175. On launch pricing ($107 vs $175), Celeron G3900E was $68 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900E delivers 19.0 pts/$ vs 11.6 pts/$ for the Phenom II X4 810 — making the Celeron G3900E the 48.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Phenom II X4 810
MSRP	$107-39%	$175
Performance per Dollar	19.0+64%	11.6
Release Date	2016	2009

Search Celeron G3900E on Amazon

Search Phenom II X4 810 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.